What are alternatives to ChartSpan?
Quick Answer
ChartSpan is the largest outsourced Chronic Care Management provider, managing over 200,000 patients, but their revenue-sharing model (approximately 50% of collections, or $30-35 per patient per month from the $62 Medicare reimbursement) leads many practices to seek alternatives that preserve more margin. The top ChartSpan alternatives are: Chronic Care IQ ($8-15/patient/month SaaS for in-house CCM), Prevounce ($5-12/patient/month multi-program platform), Signallamp Health (data-driven CCM with variable pricing), Greenway Health (CCM module within their EHR), and NPIxray (free pre-implementation analysis showing your CCM revenue opportunity). The key tradeoff is operational burden versus margin: ChartSpan handles everything but takes ~50% of revenue, while in-house platforms cost 80-90% less but require your staff to perform the clinical work. Before choosing any platform, use NPIxray's free NPI scan to determine your exact CCM-eligible patient count and potential annual revenue from CMS billing data analysis of 1,175,281 providers.
Why Practices Seek ChartSpan Alternatives
ChartSpan delivers genuine value as a full-service CCM provider. They handle patient enrollment calls, monthly care coordination, care plan management, clinical documentation, and billing. However, their pricing model creates the primary motivation for switching. At approximately 50% of collections, ChartSpan retains roughly $30-35 per patient per month from the $62 Medicare reimbursement for 99490. For a practice with 80 enrolled CCM patients, that means approximately $28,800-$33,600 annually going to ChartSpan rather than the practice. Additional reasons practices explore alternatives: limited control over patient interactions (ChartSpan staff make the calls, not your team), standardized care plans that may not reflect your practice's clinical preferences, dependence on a third party for a significant revenue stream, and challenges with patient satisfaction when external staff represent your practice. Some practices also report that ChartSpan's enrollment-focused approach may not align with quality-first clinical goals.
In-House CCM Platforms (Lower Cost, More Control)
Chronic Care IQ is the leading in-house CCM platform, providing workflow automation for practices that manage CCM with their own staff. Features include automated care plan generation, built-in time tracking, patient communication tools, and billing code generation. Pricing ranges from $8-15 per patient per month with no revenue sharing. At 80 patients, annual platform cost is approximately $7,680-$14,400 versus ChartSpan's $28,800-$33,600. Prevounce offers a multi-program platform covering CCM, RPM, and AWV in a single system at $5-12 per patient per month. Their integrated approach is ideal for practices implementing multiple Medicare programs simultaneously. Features include EHR integrations, consent tracking, and compliance dashboards. For practices wanting to reduce the labor component, hybrid models exist where the software platform handles automation and documentation while your staff provides the clinical interaction. This preserves the patient relationship while minimizing administrative burden. One care coordinator earning $45,000-$55,000 annually can manage 80-120 CCM patients using these platforms.
Data-Driven and Hybrid Alternatives
Signallamp Health takes an analytics-first approach to CCM, using CMS data and practice data to identify optimal enrollment targets and predict patient compliance. Their platform helps prioritize which patients to enroll based on clinical complexity, reimbursement potential, and retention likelihood. Pricing is variable based on service level. HealthSnap offers a combined RPM + CCM platform with a focus on patient engagement through their patient-facing app. Useful for practices wanting RPM and CCM integration. TimeDoc Health provides a hybrid model where their remote care team supplements your in-house staff, handling overflow work during peak periods. This flexibility appeals to practices that want to maintain primary control but need scalability. Greenway Health and Athenahealth include basic CCM modules within their EHR platforms at no additional per-patient cost (included in EHR subscription). These built-in tools are less feature-rich than dedicated platforms but eliminate the need for separate software. NPIxray fills the pre-decision gap by analyzing your CMS billing data to show exactly how many CCM-eligible patients you have before committing to any platform.
Cost Comparison: ChartSpan vs Alternatives
For a practice with 80 CCM-enrolled patients, here is the annual cost comparison. ChartSpan (full outsource): approximately $28,800-$33,600/year (50% of collections), with zero staff time required and net revenue of approximately $30,000-$35,000. Chronic Care IQ (in-house SaaS): approximately $7,680-$14,400/year for software, plus one part-time care coordinator at approximately $22,000-$27,000, yielding net revenue of approximately $18,000-$30,000. Prevounce (in-house multi-program): approximately $4,800-$11,520/year for software, plus staff costs similar to above, yielding net revenue of approximately $20,000-$32,000. Built-in EHR module (Athenahealth, etc.): $0 additional software cost, plus staff time, yielding net revenue of approximately $32,000-$42,000 but with less workflow automation. The break-even point where in-house becomes more profitable than outsourced is typically around 40-50 enrolled patients, assuming you already have clinical staff who can absorb CCM duties or you hire a part-time coordinator. Below 40 patients, ChartSpan's zero-effort model may be more cost-effective despite the higher per-patient cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I switch from ChartSpan to in-house CCM?
Yes, but plan a transition period. Key steps: select a platform, train staff on CCM workflows, notify patients of the care team change, and ensure billing continuity. Most transitions take 60-90 days.
Will patients notice if I switch CCM providers?
Patients currently receiving ChartSpan calls will notice a change in who contacts them. When switching to in-house, many practices report improved patient satisfaction because patients prefer speaking with their own care team.
Do I need to re-consent patients when switching?
Best practice is to re-confirm consent when changing the entity providing CCM services, even if not strictly required by CMS. This also serves as an engagement touchpoint with patients.
How do I know if I have enough patients for in-house CCM?
Use NPIxray's free NPI scan to see your Medicare patient volume and chronic condition prevalence. Generally, practices with 40+ CCM-eligible patients can justify the in-house model financially.
See Your Practice's Specific Numbers
Enter any NPI number to instantly see missed revenue from E&M coding gaps, CCM, RPM, BHI, and AWV programs — based on real CMS Medicare data.
Scan Your NPI